Jane Jacobs - The Death And Life Of Great American Cities

JANE JACOBS THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIESJane Jacobs 1961 work The ravaging and Life of heavy(p) American Cities examines the problems with post-World War II urban planning and argue that cities should embrace optical and kindly diversity , moveion , and mixed uses in neighborhoods . She aims her most pointed criticisms at the dark urban renewal projects of the 1950s and `60s , which she argues disrupted neighborhood fabrics and worsened urban conditions instead of improving themQUESTION ONEJacobs argues that great cities require essential air beyond simply neighborhoods and take a to a great extent holistic approach , with estimable streets clear delineations amidst cosmos and private spaces , sm all blocks , and get-go-rise buildings from which the sidewalks are easily visible(a) . Great urban en vironments literally start with the streets and sidewalks , where mickle interact with some(prenominal) one a nonher throughout the day and the strengthened environment . Vital cities need and should encourage amicable interactions , build a variety of uses (residential and commercialized should have spaces that allow much(prenominal) interaction ( resembling safe streets and parks , and should embrace a stage of social and visual diversity . She also maintains that cities do not need to be decentralized or redistributed , as planners of the time were doing , and that planners must(prenominal) heed cities social and physical realities quite an than imposing theories . urban renewal projects practically fail because they are too huge in scale , lack respective(a) amenities (many were mostly commercial projects for example , and were homogeneous spaces where social interaction did not ofttimes occur throughout the dayQUESTION TWOForms of social interaction (other than those created by universe spaces like soci! al organizations and residential classes support because they unite hatful from different backgrounds and neighborhoods , and heathenish organizations help assimilate and include newcomers , who often find urban emotional state isolating and modify . They need to transcend neighborhood and ethnic boundaries , as Jacobs says , [City] people are mobile .

[and] are not stuck with the provincialism of a neighborhood , any why should they be ? Isn t wide extract and rich opportunity the point of cities (Jacobs 116 ) isolation , Jacobs claims , is bad for cities because it contributes more than to crime and slum development than low i ncome aloneQUESTION THREEJacobs believes that post-World War II urban planners had good intentions but employ inappropriate methods of relations with cities , often because they adhered to theories instead of examining cities realities which often contradicted the theories and principles they utilize . In plus , she claims they had an innate fear and disdain for cities favoring suburbs (much like the federal judicature did , with highway construction and the FHA s suburban twine ) and applying methods to cities that overlooked the conditions indispensable for social interaction and public rubber eraser . Planners often embraced urban renewal projects such as high-rise housing projects and too large commercial complexes , which failed because their size discouraged smooth monitoring of the sidewalks and streets , did not generate sufficient pedestrian handicraft at all times of day , lacked a proportionateness of amenities with residences , and promoted more danger an d less use than...If you hope to get a full essay, o! rder it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper